Testing machine for elastomeric bearings under Standard EN 1337-3, Model ME-408
Offer price breaks when you order a larger quantify.
Leading time would be depends on our work efficiency and delivery schedule, usually within 2 business days.
Shipping: Ships in 2 business day
T SLOT ALUMINUM FRAMING
modular design approach for application efficiency
The tool workbench is made of aluminum profiles as raw materials, using a variety of aluminum profiles, cutting precision, It is easy to process, and the surface is not rusty. It can be combined with various materials and accessories to assemble into various Various styles of workbenches are beautiful and portable, easy to disassemble and assemble, flexible to adjust, and can be customized on demand.
It does not require maintenance and is widely used in various industrial production industries.
safety & guarding
Aluminum profile small shield Product classification: Industrial fence/protection case The whole is made of aluminum profile 4040 and frosted pc board. The overall appearance is beautiful and atmospheric, relatively stable, and the size can be customized according to requirements
Machine Enclosure Machine Frame
The automobile inspection fixture frame is assembled with aluminum profiles and accessories, and the product is designed according to customer requirements Appropriate frame structure, using heavy-duty profiles and supporting connectors, beautiful products , Atmosphere, high strength, please consult APS online customer service for details
SIST EN 1337-5:2005 - Structural bearings - Part 5: Pot
EN 1337.5!2005 (E) 7 3.1.7 pot component with a machined recess which contains the elastomeric pad, piston and internal seal 3.1.8 pot bearing structural bearing consisting of an elastomeric pad (rotational element) confined in a cylinder by means of a close fitting piston and an internal seal 3.1.9 sliding pot bearing pot bearing combined with ...
Testing Machine For Elastomeric Bearings Under Standard EN 1337-3, Model ME-408 - Image
More Testing Machine For Elastomeric Bearings Under Standard EN 1337-3, Model ME-408 images
UNE EN 1337-3:2005 Structural bearings - Part 3: Elastomeric
This standard UNE EN 1337-3:2005 Structural bearings - Part 3: Elastomeric bearings is classified in these ICS categories: 91-010-30, 91-080-01
Elastomeric Bearings - Recommended Test Methods | Strength Of
ELASTOMERIC BRIDGE BEARINGS- RECOMMENDED TEST METHODS. SUMMARY. Plain and steel-laminated elastomeric bearings have had an exemplary performance record over the past 40 years. Recently, increased testing requirements have been imposed that now make the testing of the elastomeric bearings one of the major costs of the supports.
(PDF) SYNER-G Reference Report-4: Guidelines for deriving
SYNER:G Reference Report:4: Guidelines for deriving seismic fragility functions of elements at risk: Buildings| lifelines| transportation networks and critical facilities
SHEAR MODULUS TESTING METHOD FOR ELASTOMERIC
elastomeric bearings; Laminated elastomeric bearings have low shear stiffness but are very stiff under compression due to steel reinforcing plates (Fig; 1); Current method of determining the apparent shear modulus of elastomeric bearings is provided by EN 1337:3:2005; Fig; 1: Cross section of a laminated elastomeric bearing 200x300x41 mm 2;
both TS EN 1337:3 and BS 5400 specifications separately; It is observed that shear modulus decrease with Mullin’s Effect for standard bearings while decreasing in
A study on the characteristics of bridge bearings behavior by
The test of characteristics of spherical elastomeric bearing had compression and rotation tests performed following the Compression Test Spec. of ISO 22762 (2010) and BS EN 1337_3 (2005). Finding that individual laminated elastomers were great in strength change due to 1st Shape Factor in design phase, specimen shape factor, rubber shear ...
Experimental study on mechanical properties of casting high
As the current work is an initial study on CPUE bearings, the shear failure model was investigated in the horizontal ultimate test while the buckling failure was not considered. Herein, the shape coefficient range was 7.14–12.5, which is slightly beyond the usual scope of 8–12 for bridge rubber bearing  .